Archive

Archive for the ‘Culture’ Category

An Open Letter to Those Who Drive Cars

This is directed to those of you who drive cars, especially those of you who live in small towns like the one I live in.  Actually, it doesn’t concern all of you, only some of you.

Look at the pedals at your feet.  At most, there are three of them.  For the vast majority of you, there are only two.

Now, I’m not a mechanic.  But I am fairly certain . . . one of those pedals . . . means . . .

GOOOOOOOO!!!!!

In my car, it’s the one on the right.  Make your fellow drivers happy and figure out which one it is in your car.

Madonna and Michael Jackson

15 September 2009 Rodney Dunning 1 comment

On Sunday evening Madonna opened the MTV Video Music Awards with a speech honoring the late Michael Jackson.  It was altogether fitting that she do this.

If Michael Jackson was the King of Pop, Madonna is the Queen.  Where Jackson created pop’s most successful album, Madonna created its most successful career (post Beatles).  Perhaps she alone was qualified to summarize Jackson’s life and legacy, not because she knew him particularly well, but because no one else on the MTV stage commands her level of respect.

Plus, her mother died.  In the world of MTV Logic, it is impossible for any person to utter false or illogical statements in the same speech in which she mentions her mother’s death.

Madonna observed that Jackson’s childhood was sacrificed for the sake of his career.  To one degree or another, we all participated in this.  Then we left him behind.  How shameful.  For his part, his adult life was a struggle to recapture what, according to Madonna, he never experienced.  He wanted his childhood.  He wanted friendship.  He wanted to be vulnerable.

Through it all, he was a legend, indeed The Legend.  The King of Pop.

But according to a massive amount of evidence, Jackson’s relationship with young boys was bizarre and unhealthy at best, and criminal at worst.  Madonna’s analysis might explain why Jackson built an amusement park to live in, and why he was apparently obsessed with all things childhood, but it doesn’t fully account for his weird behavior.

For those of us who remember when Thriller was at the top of the Billboard Charts, who bought the album on cassette tape and vinyl, Jackson had long-since morphed into an unrecognizable oddity, far removed from the ultra suave cat who denied Billy Jean’s child was his own.

The Michael Jackson of the early 80s was other-worldly.  The vocals, hooks, dance moves, and sophisticated charm set the bar so high no one could hope to reach it.  You might imitate Eddie Van Halen, or Freddy Mercury, or Ozzie, but few even made the effort to copy MJ.  We had too much respect for him.

In the world of pop, in 1982, Jackson was God, and Thriller was his Bible.  When my class entered Junior High School, Thriller was the #1 album in the nation.  When we left Junior High School three years later, it was still #1.  That was ridiculous.

But later, Jackson became ridiculous, in the wrong kind of way.

Madonna’s apologetic should perhaps be read in the limited context of Jackson’s artistic contributions.  In the areas of singing, dancing, live performance, writing, and producing, Jackson had few equals, and in the union of them, he had none. Many an artist has suffered under the crushing weight of an ultra-successful album.  Look at Axl Rose.  But while Jackson never duplicated Thriller (who could?), he continued to make good music, and when viewed through the MTV cultural lens, was at worst a misunderstood eccentric.

Did Jackson have sex with underage boys?  I don’t know.  It’s disturbing and disappointing that a “yes” answer would be consistent with everything else we know about him.  It’s also disturbing that he turned into such a freakish character. But it’s difficult to swim against the powerful tradition in our culture of forgetting everything negative about a person when he dies.  We want to carry away from the funeral only the good things, the things that inspired and moved us, the things that can make us happier and better.  Jackson gave enough good things to last the rest of our lives.

I have a copy of Thriller on my Ipod, and several other Jackson hits.  I still enjoy them.  The dude who made those songs left the world about twenty years ago.  I don’t know where he went.  The oddball that replaced him, and died recently, I don’t understand and can’t defend.  But I hope he has some peace.

Instruction Manual for Life

See what you think of this:

The blurb on the YouTube page reads: “For those critics who read this video as an ‘attack’, or commentary on one specific religious/political/ideological group, a message: look deeper.”

Naming Your Kid Hitler: A New Form of Child Abuse?

17 December 2008 Rodney Dunning Leave a comment

A New Jersey couple has given the following name to their son: Adolph Hitler Campbell. He is three years old, and already encountering problems: a grocery store refused to spell out his name on a birthday cake. (Don’t worry, another retailer known for sticking up for the little guy came through.)

adolfhitler

The kid’s siblings are named JoyceLynn Aryan Nation Campbell and Honszlynn Hinler Jeannie Campbell. Hinler is named after Heinrich Himmler, head of the SS, and, along with Hitler, one of the most despicable human beings in history.

Between 1939 and 1945, the Nazis and their collaborators murdered six million Jews throughout Europe.

Thousands of children are growing up with crazy parents, and thousands of others have been given ridiculous names. Nearly all of them (we hope) have a fighting chance at normalcy. But here are three children growing up in a terrible union of these two sets, facing many years of underserved problems, harassment, and moral confusion.

Heartbreaking.

alg_adolf

Categories: Culture

Anti-Intellectualism in the Republican Party

Writing for the Wall Street Journal, Mark Lilla observes the following:

Over the next 25 years there grew up a new generation of conservative writers who cultivated none of their elders’ intellectual virtues — indeed, who saw themselves as counter-intellectuals. Most are well-educated and many have attended Ivy League universities; in fact, one of the masterminds of the Palin nomination was once a Harvard professor. But their function within the conservative movement is no longer to educate and ennoble a populist political tendency, it is to defend that tendency against the supposedly monolithic and uniformly hostile educated classes. They mock the advice of Nobel Prize-winning economists and praise the financial acumen of plumbers and builders. They ridicule ambassadors and diplomats while promoting jingoistic journalists who have never lived abroad and speak no foreign languages. And with the rise of shock radio and television, they have found a large, popular audience that eagerly absorbs their contempt for intellectual elites.  They hoped to shape that audience, but the truth is that their audience has now shaped them.

(Emphasis mine.)  HT: PoliBlog.

Michigan Woman Denies Halloween Candy to Obama Supporters

3 November 2008 Rodney Dunning 1 comment

H/T: WriteChic

America First?

15 September 2008 Rodney Dunning Leave a comment

At Mainstream Baptist, Bruce Prescott has written a short but blistering critique of American evangelicals and their loyalty to the Republican Party:

Christians are warned not to divide their loyalties. We put “God first” or else God is not God in our lives. Nothing in scripture authorizes God’s people to equate their loyalty to God with loyalty to their nation. There is much that forbids it. Jesus commands us to be singlemindedly devoted to God and his kingdom (Matt. 6:24-34). His kingdom is not of this world (John 18:36).

Christians should not even put “country second.” Discipleship requires that we share the same priorities as our Lord. If God so loved “the world” that he sent his only Son to die for it, and the Son was obedient unto death, then the good of the world as a whole deserves more concern from his disciples than the good of any single nation. At best, then, country only comes in third.

That’s not a message that most American evangelicals have ears to hear. They don’t have ears because they have no desire to pay attention to the genuine demands of discipleship. The thought of self-conscious self-sacrifice for the benefit of strangers is completely foreign to them. They’re looking for cheap grace. They only have ears for those who will tell them what they want to hear and who ask them to make sacrifices only for what is near and dear.

It would be hard for me to conceive of a more damning indictment of American evangelicalism if it weren’t for the research that indicates how widely evangelicals defend the government’s use of torture as an investigative technique.

Sarah Palin on the Cover of Vogue

1 September 2008 Rodney Dunning 10 comments

Have you seen this photograph?

It’s doing laps around the Internet, snaring many a blogger who assumed it was real, and has even showed up in some newspapers.  But’s a fake.  Look at the bottom of the image.  “TheKoKon.com” is a reference to Kodiak Konfidential, the blog where the image originally appeared.  Follows these two links for more information:

I remember telling my thesis advisor at Wake Forest years ago that because of Photoshop, photographs would soon cease to be the kind of incontrovertible record we were accustomed to.  This is a good example, although I’m disappointed anyone would be taken in by this picture.  Aside from the big fat “TheKoKon.com” sitting at the bottom of the image, isn’t it obvious that Palin’s head doesn’t fit the model’s body?

And seriously, since when can the governor of any state appear in her slip on the cover of a magazine and not cause a major media sensation before she’s selected as the Republican VP?

Palin did pose for Vogue.  Here is one of the authentic Vogue pictures:

Categories: Culture, Politics Tags: ,

More on the Mt. Soledad Cross: Is the Cross a “Patriotic” Symbol?

The New York Times reports than an appeal will be filed in the Ninth Circuit.

James E. McElroy, a lawyer for Steve Trunk, the atheist who had filed suit, said an appeal would be filed within a couple of weeks with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Mr. McElroy said that court would probably not rule for more than a year.

Mr. McElroy said Judge Burns had “clearly got it wrong” and had strived to avoid what Mr. McElroy saw as the central point: that a pre-eminent religious symbol, which he argued was placed with religious intent, should not be permitted to stand on federal property.

Read more…

What Does the Cross Signify?

Near San Diego is a controversial 40-foot cross that sits on a federal war memorial.

The Constitutionality of the Mt. Soledad Cross has been under challenge since 1989, with critics charging that the federal government should not be maintaining a religious symbol on federal land.  But federal judge Larry Alan Burns has ruled the cross can stay put: Read more…